About Me

Name: The Patriot
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Earn It

     As has been my Memorial Day tradition these last few years, I just finished watching Saving Private Ryan.  Though the film is nearly three hours long, the heart of the message is contained in a very few minutes at the end.  After all three of his brothers are killed in combat in World War II, General of the Army George C. Marshall sends a contingent of Rangers to locate Private James Ryan and bring him home.

     Though questions are raised about sacrificing more lives to save one, the Ranger commander, CPT John Miller, does his duty and leads the Rangers forward.  The Rangers are confronted with their fears and with many of the moral uncertainties of war, and suffer the loss of many of their team by the time they find Ryan.  But the message comes in the climactic final battle.  With almost all of the Rangers now lost, CPT Miller is mortally wounded.  As he lies dying, he pulls Ryan near, and utters this command:  "Earn this.  Earn it."

     Earn it.  We flash forward to an elderly Ryan, who has returned with his family to Normandy.  As he stands over the grave of CPT Miller, he asks his wife to tell him that he's led a good life, that he's a good man.  We should ask ourselves this question on Memorial Day.  Have we earned it, the life we have?  Have we earned the sacrifice of so many who came before, and do we continue to earn the sacrifice of those who protect us today?  We live the lives we lead only because of the sacrifice of the CPT Millers out there, past and present.  We are all Private Ryan. Earn it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Guilty

     I know, I know.  It has been a long while since I last posted anything, but it's frankly been a little overwhelming lately.  There is so much going so wrong, so fast, all at the same time, that I haven't been able to get far enough ahead of it to put together anything thoughtful and somewhat original.  It's like the joke from Ghostbusters:  "Dogs and cats living together...mass hysteria!"

     But after the recent report on right-wing extremism from the Department of Homeland Security, I feel I must speak.  After all, I don't want to be left out, do I?  Although we can no longer spy on actual terrorists inside the US, it appears that now the new administration may actually favor surveillance of citizens who have no criminal record, no affiliation with terrorist groups, and have no actual plans to carry out violence of any sort.  The danger?  That their political beliefs and associated Constitutionally-protected political speech run counter to the Obama administration's leftist agenda, and that must be stopped.  Bottom line:  if you have strong conservative convictions and speak on them, that makes you suspect and, in the eyes of the DHS, a potential terrorist.

     So let me sum up:

    I favor a (much) smaller Federal government.
    I favor lower taxes.
    I am pro-life.
    I favor controlling the border and aggressively combating illegal immigration.
    I favor a strong military, with a budget to match.
    I am pro-Second Amendment.
    I oppose government intervention in the economy.
    I am a veteran.

Does that make me a right-wing extremist?  Am I a potential terrorist?  The Department of Homeland Security says it does.  I tell you this:  when the left succeeds in making political opposition into extremism, and this becomes the accepted definition, we are done for.  If they can make the sale that American citizens who believe differently are extremists, even though they have neither planned nor taken any violent action, then the First Amendment is finished, and so are we all.  This will turn the United States of America into a totalitarian state, where dissent is a crime (think China).  If saying this makes me an extremist, then I am guilty as charged.  Put that on your watch list.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obscene

“Obscene: 

1: disgusting to the senses: repulsive

2 a: abhorrent to morality or virtue; specifically: designed to incite to lust or depravityb: containing or being language regarded as taboo in polite usage <obscene lyrics>c: repulsive by reason of crass disregard of moral or ethical principles <an obscene misuse of power>d: so excessive as to be offensive <obscene wealth><obscene waste>”

This is how Webster’s defines the word, and I can find no better to describe the two Congressional spending bills floating around Capitol Hill. One of the main reasons that I haven’t written much since the election is that I have truly been at a loss for words most of the time. What can I possibly say that has not already been said?

You can read any number of authors, pundits, economists, and other experts who can enumerate the multitude of reasons that the $1 trillion+ spending proposed by our government is beyond gross in its incompetence; beyond crooked in its duplicity and deception. Read almost anything by Thomas Sowell or Walter E. Williams, and you will get it. Still, I suspect that if you are on Townhall.com and reading this blog, you already do.

So…what now? The cynic in me (who seems to carry the most weight lately) says that there is no way that Congress is not going to pass some sort of spending bill, and that it is going to be big. Can it possibly be stopped? Probably not. Can it be somehow trimmed or reduced? Maybe. I have contacted the offices of both my Representative and Senators, and made my thoughts on the matter clear. I oppose any sort of pork-packed spending bill intended to “jump start” the economy with a massive influx of cash (in a couple years). The only way to stimulate the economy is to allow businesses and individuals to keep more of the money they earn in the first place, through reductions in tax rates. Call your elected officials and tell them no.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Half-Step Better Than None

     In about two more months, Jose Compean and Ignacio Ramos will finally walk free.  In one of his last acts as President, George W. Bush has today commuted the sentences of two Border Patrol officers, convicted of shooting a suspected drug smuggler in the backside and subsequently imprisoned in 2007.  While a full pardon given two years ago would have been better, commutation is hardly a consolation prize.  Especially when you consider that these two men were looking at 12 and 11 year sentences, which they likely would have served in full had this not been done prior to noon tomorrow.

     Still the news is not all good , as without pardons Ramos and Compean are now felons, convicted of crimes of violence involving firearms.  They can never work in law enforcement again, cannot possess a firearm, and cannot vote.  They still have a long hard road ahead of them.  So if you think that this case will not have an effect on the Border Patrol in particular, and law enforcement in general, think again.  If you can still get people willing to take on the job, at best they will be more reluctant to take decisive action to enforce the law, and criminals will benefit.  At worst, they will be more hesitant to act forcefully when confronted with violence, and cops will get hurt.

     I pray that Ramos, Compean and their families they will soon be reunited, and able to find some peace, and that they may someday soon enjoy a happy and fulfilling life once again.  It's a good day.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Best News You'll Never Hear...

     You probably won't hear much about this in the mainstream media, anyway.  Earlier today, while much of America was still sleeping off the remains of 2008, the United States was officially handing off control of Baghdad's "Green Zone" to Iraqi authorities.  Saddam Hussein's presidential palace had served as the U.S. embassy and military headquarters in Iraq, but today was returned to a sovereign Iraqi government.

     But will anybody notice?  It's doubtful.  The media has spent the last few days bemoaning just how awful 2008 was (based largely on the last three months of the year).  We've all seen the headlines, "Thank God It's Over!" or others like it, as talking heads rehash the worst of the past 365 days.  While every "news" show in the country was filling air time with stories about New Year's resolutions, horoscopes and predictions, and hangover remedies, the Iraqi government was marking a major milestone in its return to independence.

     Still, it is encouraging to see.  Despite our economic struggles at home, 2008 was a year of great gains in Iraq.  Violence has dropped off dramatically, from an average of about 180 attacks per day a year ago to approximately 10 per day now.  American military deaths have decreased by almost 60%, and a similar decrease also applies to the Iraqis.  The murder rate in Iraq is about 1 per 100,00 citizens (the FBI reported that the 2007 murder rate in the U.S. was 5.6 per 100,000).

     So while America stumbles, pessimistic and  bleary-eyed out of 2008 and into 2009, there is good news to be found.  You just have to look for it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Resolution

     Now, I'm not much for the whole New Year's resolution thing, but I heard something yesterday that piqued my interest in the concept.  It seems that there is research out there that says that somewhere between 80%-90% of New Year's resolutions are broken by the end of January.  While it might be easy to see that as a negative and get discouraged, I am a glass half-full kind of guy.

     So for the sake of finding the positive in things, I have developed a strategy to make near-certain failure work for me.  Therefore, I resolve to not sleep with Jennifer Aniston in 2009!  We'll see if that doesn't tilt the odds in my favor...  Anybody know if she reads this?

     Happy New Year!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Gift

     As I sit here enjoying a sip of a particularly nice single malt whisky, I am watching the clock tick ever closer to the stroke of midnight and the dawning of Christmas Day.  I'm listening to Pavarotti sing "O Holy Night," and reflecting on the season and its meaning.  I just left my sister's house, where she is raising my two nieces without the help of their father, who walked away from them five years ago.

     They are wonderful girls, who in their short lives have already taught me more about love than I learned in all the thirty-plus years I lived before they arrived in my life.  The most important thing I learned about love is that it is real.  You cannot touch it or taste it or see it with your eyes; none of our earthly senses can detect it.  It is not a thing of science.  There are no tests that can prove its existence, and there are no formulas or computer programs that can replicate it.  But it is real.

     No matter how much we can deduce with our brains and measure with the technology we create, we can only know that we love and are loved through our souls.  Souls that are God's creation make it possible for us to experience and share His greatest gift...love.  So when asked how I can know there is a God, I respond, "because I love."  He demonstrated this greatest gift two-thousand and eight years ago when He sent His Son to save us.

     I will go back to my sister's house in the morning.  We will all exchange gifts...we'll throw wrapping paper everywhere.  There will be Christmas stockings dumped in the floor, one bewildered cat, games and toys, new slippers, books and music.  And there will be love...the greatest gift of all.

     Thank you to those who read my words on these pages, and for your compliments and comments.  I wish you all the Merriest of Christmases, I wish you peace, and most of all I wish you love.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

So Much For Hope

     "It's going to get worse before it gets better," proclaimed the President-elect on Meet The Press today.  Seeming to channel Jimmy Carter, I have yet to hear much from Barack Obama that sounds like hope.  I don't hear the messiah-like inspirational oratory that came so easy when he was looking for votes.  He sounds much more like a man who has come to the realization that there is very much in this country that may well be outside his...or any one individual's...ability to fix.  Audacity only gets you so far.  But one thing is for sure...change we will get, one way or the other.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thankful

     In spite of the difficult times we face today, most of us will sit with family today to celebrate the good fortune in our lives.  I for one, will give thanks for the sacrifice of our military.  Many of them will be thousands of miles from their families, and if their mission allows it, they will have a holiday meal in a dusty mess hall.  They will be wearing combat boots and body armor, and have a rifle slung over their shoulder.  Meanwhile, on the other side of the globe, their families will gather around a Thanksgiving table with one empty chair.  Because of them, and all those who went before them, we can enjoy this holiday with our families in peace.  For that I thank them, and I thank God for such heroes, who daily place themselves between us and those who would do us harm.

     Happy Thanksgiving.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Few

     Less than 1% of the total population of the U.S. served in the military.  Think about it this Veteran's Day.  I salute my fellow vets, and extend my most sincere thanks to those who continue to serve today.

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers.  For he who sheds his blood with me to-day shall be my brother.."

-- from Henry V, by William Shakespeare
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Morning After

     The deed is done.  American voters will now have to roll over and look with sober eyes what they brought home from the party last night.  There is no arguing that the moment is historic; that the election of the nation's first African-American president brings the civil rights struggle full circle is undeniable.  For that we may be proud.

     But it is also undeniable that while he may have looked irresistible through America's beer goggles last night, the ugly truth is that we now will have one of the most radical, most liberal, most left-leaning presidents in history.  If made reality, many of his campaign promises will change America for a long time to come, if not forever.  It is no secret that I very much disagree with the goals of our president-elect and how he aims to achieve them; I truly think that the danger to America is very real in this regard.

    In his victory speech last night, Barack Obama indicated he has already begun sobering up...or triangulating back towards reality.  "We may not get there in one year, or even one term," he said to the adoring Chicago crowd.  It's as if the buzz has now worn off and he has seen how high he has set the bar for himself...like the emotionally intoxicated revelers need to be warned that he might not be as good in the sack as he led them to believe.  Now, American voters will get their turn to sober up and look at what they have gotten into bed with.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Band-Aid

    There was a saying from my Army days:  “It’s just a band-aid on a sucking chest wound.”  For those unfamiliar with sucking chest wounds…they’re bad.  The chest wall is breached to the point that the body sucks air in through the wound, which doesn’t allow enough vital oxygen to enter the system.  The opening must be sealed to return the body to normal breathing and allow the victim any chance or survival.  Needless to say, a simple band-aid will not suffice in this case.

    The economy has suffered a sucking chest wound.  Congress is attempting to use a $700 billion band-aid to staunch the bleeding.  Unfortunately, without taking action to actually seal the wound, our economy is in serious trouble.  More drastic steps are required than simply dressing up this gash and calling it fixed.

    I’m not an economist, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.  (Sorry, but I couldn’t resist.)  Seriously, I have done a smidge of reading on basic economic principles, which is probably more than the average voter.  Still, even without that, it seems simple to me that if the elements that created this mess remain in place, we can pour money into it all day long.  The sucking chest wound is still not repaired.

    What’s the sucking chest wound?  In my estimation, it is the Community Reinvestment Act.  First enacted under Carter in 1977, and strengthened under Clinton, this law uses government influence to leverage lending institutions to grant loans to people who are otherwise unqualified.  On paper, it aims to ensure that lenders serve their communities equitably, by making loans available not just to people who can actually afford them, but to low-income applicants as well.  In practice, what has happened is that lenders approved loans to people who could not actually afford them.  They did this because of the legal pressures of the CRA and the implicit assurance that the now-infamous Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would either purchase or guarantee these shaky loans.

    Housing prices fell, and many mortgagees found themselves upside-down on loans, owing more that their house was worth.  As loan defaults rose, lenders, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac started running out of money.  Armageddon.  Free from the influence of the CRA, Freddie, and Fannie, many of these shaky loans would have never gotten off of the approval officer’s desk.  But the all-knowing government inserted itself and fixed that for us, right?

    And now they’re going to fix it again, with a $700 billion band-aid.  But the sucking chest wound remains.  Phase out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and repeal the CRA.  Get government influence out of the decision-making process of private lending institutions, and let them succeed or fail based on the quality of their own business decisions.  Patch them up for the short term if we must, but seal the sucking chest wound.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Chill Wind

    A man works at his desk in a small office, shuffling through some documents and pecking away at his computer keyboard as he answers some email.  Two men in plain-looking suits walk in unannounced.  The man at the desk looks up, and one of his visitors plops a packet of papers in front of him.  "You are being investigated," he says as he flashes a badge, "for suspicion of making public statements against the President.  You must come with us now.  We have questions for you."  The second visitor walks around behind the desk and takes the man by the arm as he stands, his eyes lowered, and they both walk him out the door.

    Where is this taking place?  Russia?  Nazi Germany?  No.  It is taking place in Barack Obama's America, in the not-too-distant future, should he win the election.  The threat of action just like this has already been implied, if not directly stated, in Missouri just days ago.

    Although the story seems to be gaining a little traction, it has largely been ignored by the larger media outlets.  At the very least, it has been given nowhere near the attention it should be receiving, considering the magnitude of the situation.  If you are unfamiliar with the story, the Barack Obama campaign has sought the help of Missouri law enforcement (prosecutors and sheriffs) in attempting to shut down political advertisers who speak against him.  Let me make this very plain:  a political candidate is attempting to use the police powers of the state to shut down his political opposition, by threatening criminal prosecution.

    So with help from local law enforcement, Barack Obama suppresses the speech of his opposition and wins the election, assuming the office of the President of the United States.  He now has the entire Department of Justice, including the F.B.I. and other Federal law enforcement under his direction.

Fast forward to the year 2012, and President Obama is running for re-election.  You are volunteering in the office of your local "Sarah Palin for President" campaign headquarters, working on flyers to distribute in your town, which point out some of President Obama's failures over the last four years.  You feel the chill wind as the door opens, and the two F.B.I. agents enter, to escort you to your questioning...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Like, OMG!

    It's pretty incredible the massive amounts of attention being paid to the recent Lindsey Lohan-John McCain dust-up.  I'm actually a bit embarrassed to even mention it here, and add anything more to what already seems way excessive.  But it brings to mind a favorite movie of mine, a little bit of 80's fluff called "Broadcast News."

    For those unfamiliar with the film, allow me to summarize (there is a point here).  William Hurt plays an attractive, up-and-coming network TV news anchor who, while being somewhat skilled at reading news from a teleprompter, is otherwise pretty shallow intellectually.  Early in the movie, he confesses that, "I don't get the news that I'm talking about!"  He is confessing this to Holly Hunter, who plays a brilliant young producer who still attempts to maintain high journalistic standards.  However, she finds herself infatuated with Hurt's character, and all sorts of complications ensue.

    I told you that to tell you this:  there is a scene in that movie which almost perfectly mirrors my thoughts on Lindsay Lohan's political musings.  At one point Hurt's character, Tom, is called upon to anchor a breaking news piece about a Libyan jet which has attacked an American base.  Near the end, they run out of content but need to fill for a second to wrap the broadcast.  With no prompter to follow, Tom hesitates and then offers the commentary, "In other words I think we're all OK."  Upon hearing this, the salty bureau chief, played by Robert Prosky, grumbles from the control booth, "Who the hell cares what you think?"

    Exactly.  Who the hell cares what Lindsey Lohan thinks about presidential election politics?  Even giving her the benefit of the doubt that she is reasonably intelligent, who would assume that her opinion is any more well-reasoned than anyone else's, and thus worthy of any more attention than anyone else's?  She is absolutely entitled to her opinion, and to state it as publicly as she wants; I don't fault her at all for that.  But where I do have some concern is the fascination of the media with what she thinks, and through guilt by association, the media consumers who suck it all up.  I also find it a bit troublesome that the McCain campaign felt compelled to respond to it at all.

    So why the fuss?  Because she is a trashy little train wreck who runs around drunk with no underwear on and probably likes the attention of the paparazzi more than she admits.  Apparently, some people seem to think that this indicates she's more enlightened than the rest of us.  So there really is no good explanation for it, other than to bang the drum against what seems to be the increasing number of Americans who equate celebrity with gravitas...and indeed, the number of airhead celebrities who do the same.  Unfortunately that is not a very satisfying explanation, no matter how true it may be.  In the end, I suppose there's no accounting for tastes...  Like, totally..
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just Plain Audacity

     So now I hear that once upon a time, Barack Obama wanted to join the military.  Apparently Obama stated just that during his recent interview with George Stephanopoulos of ABC News.  During the interview, Obama stated, "I actually always thought of the military as an ennobling and you know, honorable option," suggesting that he had considered military service.  But alas, Obama's military service was not to be.  You see there was no war to fight, no epic struggle for him to lend his gifts.  He told Stephanopoulos, "I graduated in 1979.  The Vietnam War had come to an end.  We weren’t engaged in an active military conflict at that point.  And so, it’s not an option that I ever decided to pursue."

     Call me overly sensitive, but I have always found it to be disingenuous at best, and offensive at worst when someone who never served in the military says, "I thought about joining," or "I always wanted to."  Short of those with medical disqualifiers, I often detect a bit of guilt in those making such comments.  It always comes up when they find themselves in the company of those who have served, and they are somewhat ashamed to realize that they could have but didn't.  But I understand that military life is not for everyone, and I would venture that most of us who have served wouldn't want everyone to put on a uniform.  Indeed, we have all likely served with someone who shouldn't have been there.  I find no fault with those who know that it's not for them and are honest about it.

     But attempting to relate yourself to those who have worn the uniform by talking about what you almost did rings very, very hollow.  Coming from the would-be commander-in-chief, it is worse.  Barack Obama has no real military experience or affiliation, but by spinning a tale of how he almost did it, he is trying to drape himself in the honor earned by those who actually did.  John McCain was there, and Sarah Palin and Joe Biden have sons in the service.  I think that in this statement, true or not, Barack Obama seeks some sort of equivalency by wishing.  He is attempting to take credit for something he never did, just by talking about how he thought about doing it.  (If this line of reasoning reasoning works, then I must tell you about the time I slept with Heidi Klum.)

     But even if we take him at his word...that sometime between lines of blow he did actually consider military service, his statement still is chock full of his trademark "audacity."  He would only consider joining the military if there was an active conflict?  Does he rate himself so highly that he thinks that in time of war, the military couldn't do without his particular brand of heroism?  There's a war on?  Sign me up, so I can save the world!  No war to fight?  Guess I'll take a pass on the military and go to law school and become a community organizer instead.  What I suspect though, is the subtle, backhanded insult of one who does not value the service of a peacetime military.  Barack Obama views service in a peacetime military as unworthy, and particularly unworthy to receive his sweat.

     That should be a cue to anyone who hasn't yet figured out what kind of commander-in-chief Barack Obama would be.  If he spoke the truth in the Stephanopoulos interview, the military and the people who make it up are not worth his while in time of peace.  He doesn't value the sailor who goes on six-month tours at sea, the soldier or marine out training in the field, or the airman fueling a fighter jet in Alaska during peacetime.  He certainly wouldn't consider lowering himself to become one.  There is a well-known verse, often paraphrased, which goes something like :

God and the soldier we adore,
In time of trouble, not before.
When the danger's passed and all things righted,
God is forgotten, and the soldier slighted.

     As a veteran, I am fine with this attitude (to a degree) from everyday citizens.  The soldier serves precisely so that average folks do not have to give their security a second thought, and can go about their lives in peace.  But in Barack Obama, it reveals the dangerous duplicity of one who would co-opt the honorable service of others and simultaneously disrespect it.  He has no business becoming commander-in-chief.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »